His points flat suck and they aren't well thought out at all. Right of the bat "the new tool should be cheaper than the one it replaces" On what basis is this

His points flat suck and they aren't well thought out at all. Right of the bat "the new tool should be cheaper than the one it replaces" On what basis is this even defensible? Even if you just follow this single rule we'd all still be hunter-gatherers And the last one his mask slips "It should not replace...anything...". Why privilege what already exists over what doesn't? It had it's time.