> there is 0 way of telling if the work is real or not, at which point why bother? I might argue you couldn't really tell if it was "real" before LLMs, either.

> there is 0 way of telling if the work is real or not, at which point why bother? I might argue you couldn't really tell if it was "real" before LLMs, either. But also, reviewing work without some accompanying dialogue is probably rarely considered a joy anyway.