Is bringing up Naur's paper and arguing that theory of program is all that matters and LLMs cannot do that, just a 2025 version of calling LLMs stochastic parro

Is bringing up Naur's paper and arguing that theory of program is all that matters and LLMs cannot do that, just a 2025 version of calling LLMs stochastic parrots and claiming they don't model or work in terms of concepts? Feels like it. EDIT: Not a jab at the author per se, more that it's a third or fourth time I see this particular argument in the last few weeks, and I don't recall seeing it even once before.