3 ms·
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-01/msg00572.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-01/msg00572.html
by mansr 14y ago
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-01/msg00572.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-01/msg00572.html
- noahl 14y agoJust out of curiosity, couldn't the FSF release GCC under the AGPL or something like that and then modularize it all they want? That was my first thought when reading that message. That way they can promote freedom and still have modular software. Of course, the AGPL might not have existed in 2000, but I haven't heard about GCC moving to the AGPL since then either.