> But only 1,200 miles without a human accompanying the truck. Sure? You'd only remove the man in the cabin if you'd already run many, many, many miles with th

> But only 1,200 miles without a human accompanying the truck. Sure? You'd only remove the man in the cabin if you'd already run many, many, many miles with the man in the cabin not having to take control. It's true that the company could be being irresponsible (perhaps even dangerously so). [0] We'll just have to see how the vehicle performs over the next year or five. Do make sure to compare any reports of failure to the expected rate of failure of human operators. [0] Given that they're running fully-autonomous commercial payloads, I find this unlikely.