3 ms·

I came to a conclusion that democracy is not as good as I thought initially. It has be replaced with a better system quickly or else we are going to loose all a

by gsky 1y ago

I came to a conclusion that democracy is not as good as I thought initially. It has be replaced with a better system quickly or else we are going to loose all advancements humanity made so far

Hashex129542 1y ago
[flagged]
pstuart 1y ago
And what is that better system? To date, it appears to be the "least worst" option. Regardless, the two-party system has to go.
- gsky 1y ago
  Ask yourself whether society is flourishing or crumbling?
  - pstuart 1y ago
    It's doing both, depending on one's station in life. Look at what's happening now in the US as it's democracy is getting snuffed out: it's not looking good.
- Hashex129542 1y ago
  Democracy isn't better system either least worst. It's top most worst system. It's giving power to criminals only. 2 peoples saying 1+1 = 10 and a human saying 1+1 = 2 In democracy theory 10 is very correct answer. They don't consider the answer 2 even as experiment. Now you will argue for the answer 10 only. That's crime in general. But technically you can use the loop hole to argue for Democracy. Democracy = Demo Crazy!
  - pstuart 1y ago
    All those words and yet you did not answer my question: what is the better alternative?
    - Hashex129542 1y ago
      I am not about to explain the alternative but just explain your acceptance of "least worst" option. If you look out the least worst case definitely democracy isn't alone :) It's all about your acceptance of which worst is best for you. Even Barbaric system far better than democratic system. You don't care about the decision just because of it's taken by majority peoples on your own life! Another alternative is auction system. Auction conducts between parties, so whoever has money that company will hold ruling rights for some years. It's kinda lease. It's far better system the Democratic Election bribe for Votes & of curse the auction money given to citizens but it's official. If you don't know about bribe election, check it out. https://www.google.com/search?q=tn+election+bribe https://www.google.com/search?q=tn+election+bribe
      - pstuart 1y ago
        > whoever has money that company will hold ruling rights for some years And that's better? That's what we have now, effectively, but 2 simple changes could "fix" the system significantly: 1. Campaign finance reform 2. Ranked choice voting (or similar, as RCV is not without its issues). I'd also like to see some sort of "understanding test" so that you can only vote if you can demonstrate that you understand the arguments of the proposition in question. There's no way to do that, but it makes me happy to wish it were so.

by gsky 1y ago

I came to a conclusion that democracy is not as good as I thought initially. It has be replaced with a better system quickly or else we are going to loose all advancements humanity made so far

Hashex129542 1y ago

[flagged]

pstuart 1y ago

And what is that better system? To date, it appears to be the "least worst" option. Regardless, the two-party system has to go.

gsky 1y ago
Ask yourself whether society is flourishing or crumbling?
- pstuart 1y ago
  It's doing both, depending on one's station in life. Look at what's happening now in the US as it's democracy is getting snuffed out: it's not looking good.
Hashex129542 1y ago
Democracy isn't better system either least worst. It's top most worst system. It's giving power to criminals only. 2 peoples saying 1+1 = 10 and a human saying 1+1 = 2 In democracy theory 10 is very correct answer. They don't consider the answer 2 even as experiment. Now you will argue for the answer 10 only. That's crime in general. But technically you can use the loop hole to argue for Democracy. Democracy = Demo Crazy!
- pstuart 1y ago
  All those words and yet you did not answer my question: what is the better alternative?
  - Hashex129542 1y ago
    I am not about to explain the alternative but just explain your acceptance of "least worst" option. If you look out the least worst case definitely democracy isn't alone :) It's all about your acceptance of which worst is best for you. Even Barbaric system far better than democratic system. You don't care about the decision just because of it's taken by majority peoples on your own life! Another alternative is auction system. Auction conducts between parties, so whoever has money that company will hold ruling rights for some years. It's kinda lease. It's far better system the Democratic Election bribe for Votes & of curse the auction money given to citizens but it's official. If you don't know about bribe election, check it out. https://www.google.com/search?q=tn+election+bribe https://www.google.com/search?q=tn+election+bribe
    - pstuart 1y ago
      > whoever has money that company will hold ruling rights for some years And that's better? That's what we have now, effectively, but 2 simple changes could "fix" the system significantly: 1. Campaign finance reform 2. Ranked choice voting (or similar, as RCV is not without its issues). I'd also like to see some sort of "understanding test" so that you can only vote if you can demonstrate that you understand the arguments of the proposition in question. There's no way to do that, but it makes me happy to wish it were so.