3 ms·
If you measure download cost in time then sure.. If you measure download cost in terms of bytes downloaded, or server costs, then nope. The cost would be smalle
by john_the_writer 1y ago
If you measure download cost in time then sure.. If you measure download cost in terms of bytes downloaded, or server costs, then nope. The cost would be smaller to cache.
- youngtaff 1y agoNot necessarily, compression is really effective at reducing downloaded bytes In server terms the overhead of tracking one download is going to be less that the overhead of tracking the download of the multiple components And for client side caching to be any use then a visitor would need to view more than one page and the harsh reality is many sessions are only one page long e.g. news sites, blogs etc