2 ms·
"Being anti gmo is being anti science" No, it isn't. As scientists we know how little we know of complex biological systems. This is bio-engineering based on r
by PeterStuer 1y ago
"Being anti gmo is being anti science"
No, it isn't. As scientists we know how little we know of complex biological systems. This is bio-engineering based on rickety models.
Especially in times where the US is all about 'trade balances' , would it not suite them to take onboard some of the precautionary principles adopted in other parts of the world when it comes to health and safety?
- DocTomoe 1y agoFrom the other side of the pond, when your chieftain wonders aloud again why the Europeans don't buy your beef, or your chicken, or now your pork: This here, is the reason. We like our beef clean, our chickens unchlorinated, and our pigs without heavily experimental GMO modification, thank you very much. Not because we are anti-science. Because the US has a horrible track record when it comes to how far you can go with caveat emptor.