3 ms·
The limit formatting the author doesn’t like isn’t a bug in pandoc I don’t think - it looks to me as if they have just written it ambiguously in latex. If you
by seanhunter 2y ago
The limit formatting the author doesn’t like isn’t a bug in pandoc I don’t think - it looks to me as if they have just written it ambiguously in latex.
If you write a limit as \lim_{n \to \infty} etc etc then LaTex gets to decide whether to write your limit in inline style (next to the limit) or below. If you want it always to be below then you need to write
\lim\limits_{n \to \infty}
It’s the same deal with summations and integrals.
- JadeNB 1y ago> If you write a limit as \lim_{n \to \infty} etc etc then LaTex gets to decide whether to write your limit in inline style (next to the limit) or below. If you want it always to be below then you need to write In display mode, without modifications, LaTeX has no choice; `$$\lim_{n \to \infty}$$` in the default LaTeX compiler will always put `{n \to \infty}` below `\lim`, unless you or some package have monkeyed with things to change that default behavior. (In inline mode, similarly, $\lim_{n \to \infty}$ will by default always place `{n \to \infty}` as a subscript of `\lim`, unless you or some package have changed the default behavior.)