4 ms·
It doesn't lead to curious or interesting conversation though. it's an appeal to emotion. "harmful speech" was originally defined by the far left, and it looks
by gosub100 2y ago
It doesn't lead to curious or interesting conversation though. it's an appeal to emotion. "harmful speech" was originally defined by the far left, and it looks like the far right defined it in a way that it wasn't intended. Not a surprise, is it?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- mindslight 1y agoIt's not a surprise. The discussion isn't the curious/interesting sort based around such actions being anything novel, rather it's a straightforward response to hacker ideals and our open society in general being under attack.
- gosub100 1y agoIt's abusing the site for a fake moral dilemma, when in reality it's political campaigning. It's the same cancer that took down reddit.
- mindslight 1y agoWhat is the (fake) moral dilemma of hackers reacting to government censorship?