3 ms·
It would cost less than $0.05, and it's right way more times than 1 in 1000, which would pay for itself. But everyone's entitled to their own choices.
by onlyrealcuzzo 1y ago
It would cost less than $0.05, and it's right way more times than 1 in 1000, which would pay for itself.
But everyone's entitled to their own choices.
- colonial 1y ago> RustAssistant is able to achieve an impressive peak accuracy of roughly 74% on real-world compilation errors in popular open-source Rust repositories. 5 cents, for every compilation error, for a 3/4 chance of success (which is likely disproportionately weighted towards errors I could trivially fix myself.) That easily works out to multiple wasted dollars an hour even if it only applies to manual compiler invocations, not accounting for any time wasted evaluating bogus solutions.