3 ms·
To make things clear: no, this is not an implementation of the ISO standard library. At no point was such a thing claimed. There is little point in writing one
by commandersaki 1y ago
To make things clear: no, this is not an implementation of the ISO standard library. At no point was such a thing claimed. There is little point in writing one of those, there are several high quality implementations available. "Standard library" in this context means "a collection of low level functions and types that would be needed by most applications".
I was hoping it'd be about an ISO standard library implementation. Mostly because the GNU and Clang ones are difficult to read.