3 ms·

An important detail missing from the headline is that the painting has been dated to be from 1500-1510.

• JawsofDeath 1y ago
  Yes, I thought it was a modern piece and already started thinking it was some kind of scam.
  • adamors 1y ago
    It does look AI generated a bit actually, quite funny
    • tasuki 1y ago
      Indeed. Ahead of its time...
  • edm0nd 1y ago
    same. I thought it was going to be some PR twist on an org caught being involved in the money laundering that blatantly goes on in the art world.
• deleted 1y ago
  [deleted]
• fanatic2pope 1y ago
  > Dendrochronology has dated the felling of the oak tree of the panel to 1483, which, accounting for the seasoning of the wood, suggests a date for the painting of soon after 1500. Sounds like they have only dated the wood in the frame to 1500. Hopefully they will do some more research and get more proof. For reference, Han van Meegeren used old frames and old canvases to forge his works. The article on his career is fascinating. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_van_Meegeren https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_van_Meegeren
• csomar 1y ago
  How rare paintings from 1500+ really are? I am genuinely asking. Some old artifacts (ie: 3000 BC) are valuable, but most artifacts are not. And there is literally tons of very old artifacts.