3 ms·
You assume a lot about me. ... which is my point as well. You can no longer tell if your interlocutor is even human, and yet you're still thinking and talking
by CamperBob2 2y ago
You assume a lot about me.
... which is my point as well. You can no longer tell if your interlocutor is even human, and yet you're still thinking and talking about books written in the 1980s.
(NLP wasn't much of a money pit back in the 80s, I know that much. If it was, somebody else must've been getting all the money...)
- namaria 2y ago> ... which is my point as well. You can no longer tell if your interlocutor is even human I don't really think modern chatbots pass the Turing test. It's not that hard to figure it out. > (NLP wasn't much of a money pit back in the 80s, I know that much. If it was, somebody else must've been getting all the money...) No, the point is that it's become one now that LLMs make it seem like we finally got the NLP interfaces we've been dreaming about for decades.
- CamperBob2 2y agoI don't really think modern chatbots pass the Turing test. It's not that hard to figure it out. A lot of people on Reddit didn't figure it out, if you've followed that story ( https://old.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1k8b2hj/meta_unauthorized_experiment_on_cmv_involving/ https://old.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1k8b2hj/meta_... ). You can file that under the apparently-infinite set of Things That Are Only Going to Get Worse.