> no one suggested a reduction in testing If you somehow haven't read either the article or any of the comments in this HN thread, many readers would prefer le

> no one suggested a reduction in testing If you somehow haven't read either the article or any of the comments in this HN thread, many readers would prefer less testing than what was announced: "none of the vaccines on the CDC's childhood recommended schedule was tested against an inert placebo, meaning we know very little about the actual risk profiles of these products" I don't need to convince you or anyone else, my own hands, arms and legs were covered in bloody blisters a few hours after the J & J booster. Anecdotes aren’t data but the way I suggest we collect data is by: testing medicines.