4 ms·
What an awful list! And I say that as a Modern Literature major who has read a lot on that list. FAULKNER IS A TERRIBLE WRITER! And while James Joyce and som
by hungryhobbit 1y ago
What an awful list!
And I say that as a Modern Literature major who has read a lot on that list. FAULKNER IS A TERRIBLE WRITER! And while James Joyce and some of the others are good writers, they don't deserve multiple entries in the top 100.
It's clear this list is really "5 librarians personal favorites."
- WillAdams 1y agoIt was from a list of 440 books (possibly what Random House then had in stock) and voted on by the board members --- it's been widely criticized/commented on, see the Wikipedia article for some further links on this.
- crims0n 1y agoCan you recommend a better one? I picked it at random when I wanted to explore literature, but it seemed to be cited often enough.
- andrepd 1y agoOne that does not omit Dostoevsky or García Marquez over mediocre books in the English language would be a good start.
- cgh 1y agoAgain, this list is from Random House, a major American English-language book publisher.
- WillAdams 1y agoMy suggestion would be to start with the authors nominated for a Nobel prize for literature. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_in_Literature https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_in_Lit... Filtering by those available in readily available English translations should yield a workable list.
- windowshopping 1y agoThe sentence "FAULKNER IS A TERRIBLE WRITER" is one of the most incredible sets of words I've ever had the misfortune to lay my eyes upon.
- morleytj 1y agoThe Sound and the Fury is an incredible piece of art with a beautifully structured narrative, in my reading of it. Why do you say he's a terrible writer in your opinion? Who would you rank higher?