>No, the point is that women and men should be treated the same wherever physically possible, to get as close as possible outcomes. That doesn't seem to make s

>No, the point is that women and men should be treated the same wherever physically possible, to get as close as possible outcomes. That doesn't seem to make sense. If women and men are different, then to get the same outcomes, surely you should treat them differently. This is how the famous "equity" illustration in HR materials works: The woman gets a different-sized box. Alternatively, we can just admit that treating people equally is a good thing even if it results in different outcomes. Realistically, we treat people as individuals but try to impartially give them a fair stab. Which makes sense.