6 ms·

Like I said, that's the point of the separation of powers. Enforcement isn't a power the judiciary has. I'm not quite clear on how your comment responds to min

• ty6853 2y ago
  Supreme court and many other courts have judicial armed officers of the court that are part of the judicial branch; they can enforce contempt or orders of the court. But of course they are way overpowered by the number of LEO in the executive.
  • dragonwriter 2y ago
    > Supreme court and many other courts have judicial armed officers of the court that are part of the judicial branch; The Supreme Court, but not lower federal courts, has its own police department, but its legal authority is limited to security for the Supreme Court building and grounds and the Supreme Court justices, and to make arrests for violations of federal law as necessary to those two functions. They do not enforce orders of the court unrelated to those functions. (For lower federal courts, these functions are performed by the US Marshals Service, a DoJ agency, which also does enforce other court orders; but, that's an executive not a judicial-branch agency.)
    • ty6853 2y ago
      The other courts in this case would be bailiffs who are judicial officers in some states.