3 ms·
1. Its in the law for decades, it is derived from the constitution 2+3: yes. After they have been declared as extremists this is permitted under the law. 4. Onl
by stop50 1y ago
1. Its in the law for decades, it is derived from the constitution
2+3: yes. After they have been declared as extremists this is permitted under the law.
4. Only after the Bundesverfassungsgericht (supreme court) officially rules that the AFD is working against the constitution and forbids them. This must be initiated from the Bundestag, Bundesrat or from the Federal Government.
- sjsdaiuasgdia 1y agoAnd these exist specifically to prevent a repeat of how Hitler did what he did. https://archive.is/g6ElI https://archive.is/g6ElI > Following his failed Beer Hall Putsch of November 1923, Hitler had renounced trying to overthrow the Weimar Republic by violent means but not his commitment to destroying the country’s democratic system, a determination he reiterated in a Legalitätseid—“legality oath”—before the Constitutional Court in September 1930. Invoking Article 1 of the Weimar constitution, which stated that the government was an expression of the will of the people, Hitler informed the court that once he had achieved power through legal means, he intended to mold the government as he saw fit. It was an astonishingly brazen statement. > “So, through constitutional means?” the presiding judge asked. > “Jawohl!” Hitler replied.