4 ms·
I don’t think it was the right date syntax for the before search operator. Below worked for me intext:"vibe coding" before:2025/02/01
by seyebermancer 1y ago
I don’t think it was the right date syntax for the before search operator.
Below worked for me
intext:"vibe coding" before:2025/02/01
- simonw 1y agoHere's that Google search: https://www.google.com/search?q=intext%3A%22vibe+coding%22+before%3A2025%2F02%2F01&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari https://www.google.com/search?q=intext%3A%22vibe+coding%22+b... The first result I got was this one https://vibecoding.vercel.app/ https://vibecoding.vercel.app/ - which is shown as being from 2023... but that's fake. Read the page and it starts by saying: > On November 30, 2023, Andrej Karpathy coined the term "vibecoding" And then includes a screenshot of Andrej's tweet - this one: https://twitter.com/karpathy/status/1886192184808149383 https://twitter.com/karpathy/status/1886192184808149383 But that tweet is dated 2nd February 2025. The Vercel-hosted site is lying about the date. I don't think Google's "before" filter actually works. It looks to me like blog spammers have figured this out and now habitually back-date their posts to a date well before they were written.
- seyebermancer 1y agoDang- Good looking out, I think you’re right. My fault for not checking the links first! Well played spammers… that totally throws a wrench in my Google dorking scraping strategy ;( lol