3 ms·
One of the movies you're talking about is from 1954. No need for the snark. If you are going back 70 years, i don't think you can call it modern pop culture any
by bawolff 2y ago
One of the movies you're talking about is from 1954. No need for the snark. If you are going back 70 years, i don't think you can call it modern pop culture anymore. If instead you said, people into movie history, then sure.
Some of them are more recent, but even the most recent movie (the Chavez one) is over a decade ago, got panned by critics and looks to be a relatively low budget film. The sort of thing people into pop culture are likely to not know about.
I think the fact you can't find anything this decade is pretty telling
- triceratops 2y agoI wasn't being snarky. The Wire is the embodiment of prestige television drama. There's nothing wrong with not being into TV. I also admitted the topic hasn't been popular of late. Your comment didn't say anything about recency. It's likely that the dwindling percentage of Americans in unions has something to do with fewer recent depictions of labor struggles in TV and movies.
- antifa 2y agoI googled The Wire and it seems like something only people 4-10 years older than me would be familiar with, which leaves 0 examples for people my age?
- GauntletWizard 2y ago[flagged]
- antifa 2y agoI'm over 30.
- bawolff 2y agoI'm in the age group that would be familiar - it was certainly influential, but i'm not exactly sure i would call it mainstream. It was on HBO in an era where that significantly limited its audience. It was never a household name the way something like lost, game of thrones or breaking bad was. I think its mostly remembered for being the start of the wave of "prestige" televidion.