I'd agree with non-capitalist, but the authors are far too absolute for my liking. The whole article hinges on examples of a non-capitalist mode of knowledge p

I'd agree with non-capitalist, but the authors are far too absolute for my liking. The whole article hinges on examples of a non-capitalist mode of knowledge production being hard to imagine or conceptualise. Wikipedia is often used as an example of precisely that idea; I reckon I'd see it in that context at least once a month. At this point, it's basically the standard example.