4 ms·
People exist on a continuum between two extremes. On the one extreme you have people who think it's rude to just talk out of nowhere, it's polite to ask questi
by crazygringo 2y ago
People exist on a continuum between two extremes.
On the one extreme you have people who think it's rude to just talk out of nowhere, it's polite to ask questions, and good conversation always starts with a question, and people make sure to frequently alternate asking the next question that changes the topic.
On the other extreme you have people who think it's rude and invasive to just ask questions out of nowhere, it's polite to give space for the other person to talk about whatever they want when they feel ready to, good conversation always starts with someone making an observation about what's on their mind, and follow-up questions are always a thing, but changing the topic is naturally done by the other person then talking about what's on their mind.
Neither is right. Neither is wrong. Most people exist closer to the middle and can adapt easily to either style. They're happy to ask questions if someone doesn't seem to talk otherwise, and they're happy to talk unprompted if the other person doesn't seem to ask them questions.
But if you're at one of the extremes, it can take work to realize that the other person isn't being rude.
If you think someone is "hogging the conversation" and never asking you questions, just talk anyways, even if it seems uncomfortable at first. It's literally what they've been waiting for, and they've probably been wondering why you're not talking and why they have to keep filling the silence since you aren't contributing interesting things to the conversation about yourself.
On the other hand, if someone just doesn't seem to be talking, try asking questions, even if it seems uncomfortable at first. It's literally what they've been waiting for, and they've probably been wondering why you're not asking things and why they have to keep asking you questions to fill the silence since you aren't contributing interesting questions.
But again -- there's no right and no wrong. I'm deeply disappointed with the article as presenting one style as superior to the other.
- creer 2y agoThe article is what it is. What we are here for is what we can make of it. And your answer is useful there. "Different strategies for filling the silence": asking or talking. (not quite what you describe) makes sense. One of my problems in there is how to gauge whether there is interest at all. I mean if they walk away, then we know, sure. But I also don't need to spend time in this "conversation" if there was no interest and the other person is merely being polite or narcisstic in answering my questions forever. Nowadays I do feel somewhat ready sometimes to prod outright, something like "what's your interest in this" - but it's not exactly subtle.