3 ms·
Look at what it took for them to get to embrace HTML tools, all of which are very recent. Whiney full page ads, screeching blog posts, deleted 'fuck apple' twee
by tsieling 14y ago
Look at what it took for them to get to embrace HTML tools, all of which are very recent. Whiney full page ads, screeching blog posts, deleted 'fuck apple' tweet tantrums. I agree that they're getting into some interesting stuff, but the path they took to get there was less than dignified. If they're indifferent now, they started out maybe not as clueless, but petulant beyond belief.
- jasonlotito 14y ago> Look at what it took for them to get to embrace HTML tools, all of which are very recent. Recent? I don't use Adobe tools one way or another, but recent is hardly the word I'd choose. It's been, what, over a decade now, or near enough to make no matter[1]. Yes, this starts with Macromedia, but it isn't like Adobe isn't working with a group to build useful tools. Just because they support their own format doesn't mean they aren't supporting other formats. This doesn't mean they only focused on standards compliance. They are a tools company, and they build tools for people to use. So, do you really mean HTML? [1] http://www.webstandards.org/action/dwtf/ http://www.webstandards.org/action/dwtf/ - Note the section "Release of Macromedia Dreamweaver MX."
- mietek 14y agoHe means HTML 5.