The link between DEI and the rest of the content of the article is not well-articulated at all. Leaving aside whether one agrees with the premise, his argument

The link between DEI and the rest of the content of the article is not well-articulated at all. Leaving aside whether one agrees with the premise, his argumentation is disjointed at best. He is attributing various symptoms of these tech leaders behaviour to them clinging to a bygone world, however he hasn't really articulated any of these symptoms beyond them thinking that "DEI" is the cause of all their problems. He can't even back it up with a single quote or published piece from one of these tech moguls which displays the opinions that he characterizes them to have. Articles as sloppy as this shouldn't get 230+ points on hackernews