3 ms·

> No, I believe this is because internet providers do not save the content which means that a copy is not considered to be made. Nope, that's not the reason, a

> No, I believe this is because internet providers do not save the content which means that a copy is not considered to be made. Nope, that's not the reason, and that's why you don't need to give a copyright license to Apple before storing your personal pictures to iCloud either, nor does Apple need a license to store copyrighted material you got a license for (like software or paid downloaded movies). Copying a blob isn't a license infringement in itself, because the blob itself was never protected by copyright. > If copies were allowed of binary blobs people could legally make pirate sites sharing copies like that. No, because sharing is what you'd get prosecuted for. Part of me thinks you should really try to start learning the basis of stuff before arguing on the internet about it, but who am I to judge your life choices. I did my best to help you learn something, but if you refuse to there's nothing more I can do.

charcircuit 2y ago
>that's why you don't need to give a copyright license to Apple before storing your personal pictures to iCloud either You do which is why it's a part of the terms of service for icloud. https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/icloud/en/tercloud https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/icloud/en/terc.... >No, because sharing is what you'd get prosecuted for. Copyright controls both reproduction and distribution. >start learning the basis of stuff before arguing on the internet about it You are being unnecessarily smug and condescending.
- littlestymaar 2y ago
  > You do which is why it's a part of the terms of service for icloud. 404 > Copyright controls both reproduction and distribution. Reproduction in the copyright sense isn't about blob copying. RAID 1 isn't a copyright infringement either… And neither is a Windows defragmentation (which is just the OS copying files around). > You are being unnecessarily smug and condescending. You are needlessly obstinate on a topic you don't understand.

charcircuit 2y ago

>that's why you don't need to give a copyright license to Apple before storing your personal pictures to iCloud either You do which is why it's a part of the terms of service for icloud. https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/icloud/en/tercloud https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/icloud/en/terc.... >No, because sharing is what you'd get prosecuted for. Copyright controls both reproduction and distribution. >start learning the basis of stuff before arguing on the internet about it You are being unnecessarily smug and condescending.

littlestymaar 2y ago
> You do which is why it's a part of the terms of service for icloud. 404 > Copyright controls both reproduction and distribution. Reproduction in the copyright sense isn't about blob copying. RAID 1 isn't a copyright infringement either… And neither is a Windows defragmentation (which is just the OS copying files around). > You are being unnecessarily smug and condescending. You are needlessly obstinate on a topic you don't understand.