3 ms·
Insecurity is often (always?) the driver of achievement. Some sort of deep-seated pathology is basically required to build the empires they have.
by jrowen 1y ago
Insecurity is often (always?) the driver of achievement. Some sort of deep-seated pathology is basically required to build the empires they have.
- Ericson2314 1y agoI'm not sure that's true, but even if it is, it is a sort of bipolar mix insecurity with hope and excitement. The mid-life crisis insecurity doesn't have the hope and the rush in the same way. It has a lot more dread and angst.
- jrowen 1y agoThe realization that you achieved as much as one could hope to achieve and you still didn't find contentment. That's honestly, to me, the saddest thing about the mega-rich. They don't know when, or how, to stop. There's no goal state where they can say "ok I made it, I can turn it off and enjoy life now, or at least stop fighting tooth and nail to hoard even more bigger numbers."
- henry2023 1y agoCompetition, not insecurity drives achievement and people who are very competitive in one skill usually will lack a ton in most other skills.
- mchlbnnn 1y agoFor individuals, though, might competitiveness often be driven by insecurity, and the point stands?
- whatnow37373 1y agoPoint is that competition is fueled by insecurity. If you are happy, truly content, with yourself you will find competing extraordinarily tiresome and unnecessary. Not saying it’s good for society by the way. I think our civilization needs the pathologically insecure to be disruptive and create room for innovation. Related traits are narcissism and psychopathy. Painful, but useful, in small doses. Musk, Altman, Bezos they are basically caricatures.