Actually, yes, it means exactly that. neilk incorrectly used a comparison operator to try and point out the logical fallacy known as affirming the consequent.

Actually, yes, it means exactly that. neilk incorrectly used a comparison operator to try and point out the logical fallacy known as affirming the consequent. But thats not what was said. At least thats what I think is happening here. I can't be sure because instead of using logic symbols they used symbols that are ambiguous at best.