3 ms·
>As of today, "vegetative electron microscopy" appears in 22 papers, according to Google Scholar. Is there any reason that journals shouldn't retract those 22
by floxy 1y ago
>As of today, "vegetative electron microscopy" appears in 22 papers, according to Google Scholar.
Is there any reason that journals shouldn't retract those 22 papers? I suppose those are probably pretty suspect journals in the first place.
- jszymborski 1y agoSo i just chose two at random now and they don't appear to be predatory journals, just journals with Impact Factors lower than 1.
- gus_massa 1y agoImagine to retract automaticaly all papers that confuse "then" and "than". My English pronunciation is so bad that I'd never confuse them, but I see that mistake quite often.
- floxy 1y agoThis isn't a mistake though, right? These papers were authored by a chat bot, so why would anyone assume that any of the conclusions are legitimate?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- gus_massa 1y agoThis is the 2017 article with the typo https://jfisheries.ut.ac.ir/article_74390_fa7bb4e3378a7fa45ef06a50966d6279.pdf https://jfisheries.ut.ac.ir/article_74390_fa7bb4e3378a7fa45e... This is the bad translation https://jfisheries.ut.ac.ir/article_74390.html https://jfisheries.ut.ac.ir/article_74390.html They probably reviewed the original article in Farsi, and nobody took a deep look at the translated abstract.