3 ms·
100% confirming the signal chat leaks were real. I guess Signal wasn't vulnerable to a 0day afterall.
by incomingpain 1y ago
100% confirming the signal chat leaks were real.
I guess Signal wasn't vulnerable to a 0day afterall.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> confirming the signal chat leaks were real Was this really debated somewhere? Even the White House didn’t bother denying it.
- incomingpain 1y agoSomething like this for example: https://nypost.com/2025/03/26/us-news/trump-says-signal-could-be-defective/ https://nypost.com/2025/03/26/us-news/trump-says-signal-coul... Personally I didnt care that much to have looked too in depth to the claims. The most advanced military's battle plans could have been broadcast widely weeks in advance to the houthis and they'd still lose.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> most advanced military's battle plans could have been broadcast widely weeks in advance to the houthis and they'd still lose I have an undergraduate aerospace background. I could find a firing solution to those jets given public data about carrier deployments and the specific take-off times (when jets are low and slow—very vulnerable). If those chats had been public for weeks, the Houthis would have scored a hit.
- Terr_ 1y agoWorth remembering that even starting the chat for work was a willful violation of record-keeping laws.