4 ms·
Regardless of what the (obscure) legal reality is in this matter, do you agree that this woman presents her case in a juvenile way, and shows a general lack of
by roel_v 14y ago
Regardless of what the (obscure) legal reality is in this matter, do you agree that this woman presents her case in a juvenile way, and shows a general lack of understanding of the real-world procedures (as opposed to how keyboard warriors imagine things are or should be) in matters like this, and an apparent unwillingness to learn about them, to a point where it makes her seem unsuitable to voice an informed opinion about it, and certainly ill-suited to be the flag bearer for a contentious topic like this one?
See how that works?
- cheez 14y agoThe people who filed the request are obviously trolling in order to: 1) Get the videos removed. 2) Potentially get real-life identifying information in order to enact a campaign of harassment. I would hate for GWW to be harassed. She is a breath of fresh air. The DMCA is fine when the complaints are legit. This penalizes both YouTube and the content creator.
- Goladus 14y agodo you agree that this woman presents her case in a juvenile way No, I don't agree. Anger at harassment and injustice isn't juvenile. Use of jargon familiar to her audience isn't juvenile either. Although I can see why others would see it that way. apparent unwillingness to learn about them I do agree this seems apparent. To a point where it makes her seem unsuitable to voice an informed opinion about it I don't know enough to judge.