4 ms·

I agree that Tim definitely comes off as a bit of a jerk. However... > First, if his art is so great, then why is it not displayed all over the place? He has a

I agree that Tim definitely comes off as a bit of a jerk. However... > First, if his art is so great, then why is it not displayed all over the place? He has a few alleged experts giving praise without criticism, and in the end, it is on the wall in his bedroom. Surely, if the art were that easy to recreate, galleries would be demanding his piece? I could be wrong but I don't think there's much demand for replicas of classic paintings even if they are incredibly high quality. A lot of the value of a Vermeer painting is that it was actually painted by Vermeer in the 17th century -- not necessarily the quality of the piece itself. Regarding your second point, who knows?

aestetix 1y ago
I thought the point of the movie was to claim that Vermeer was nothing special, and Tim's effort to recreate the painting was supposed to prove that. I think the galleries would disagree with that point, otherwise they would not care whether Vermeer actually painted them. And yes, both of my points are speculation, fueled by an immense dislike for the movie.
- colonelspace 1y ago
  The point of the documentary was to show that Vermeer may have used optics. That's it.
- daseiner1 1y ago
  If the claims are true then Vermeer is absolutely exceptional, just in a different manner than is usually considered. All painters must grapple with the technical nature of paint itself and its manipulation. Choice of type of paint, canvas, application, &c. is paramount. Rothko’s work, for instance, is only effective because he found a novel way to apply paint that lends his paintings a remarkable, nigh eerie depth of color. Spending roughly half an hour just staring at the Seagram murals in the “Rothko Room” at the Tate Modern is one of my all-time favorite experiences.
  - resize2996 1y ago
    There have been posts about reproducing art and I always thinking maybe I could make a mini-Rothko room in spare room.
    - daseiner1 1y ago
      that would be cool! sincerely. post it here if you do. i feel like the above comment might come across as sarcastic but i genuinely find it super cool when a layman can master a new discipline with force of will and publicly available writings. much like vermeer's much speculated-upon clever use of technology ;)
- adastra22 1y ago
  I think you are projecting. I don’t recall getting any of that from the movie, which I recall being very respectful of Vermeer’s legacy. The narrators (Penn and Teller) are themselves magicians and it would be immensely hypocritical of them to denigrate an artist by showing there’s an underlying trick.

aestetix 1y ago

I thought the point of the movie was to claim that Vermeer was nothing special, and Tim's effort to recreate the painting was supposed to prove that. I think the galleries would disagree with that point, otherwise they would not care whether Vermeer actually painted them. And yes, both of my points are speculation, fueled by an immense dislike for the movie.

colonelspace 1y ago
The point of the documentary was to show that Vermeer may have used optics. That's it.
daseiner1 1y ago
If the claims are true then Vermeer is absolutely exceptional, just in a different manner than is usually considered. All painters must grapple with the technical nature of paint itself and its manipulation. Choice of type of paint, canvas, application, &c. is paramount. Rothko’s work, for instance, is only effective because he found a novel way to apply paint that lends his paintings a remarkable, nigh eerie depth of color. Spending roughly half an hour just staring at the Seagram murals in the “Rothko Room” at the Tate Modern is one of my all-time favorite experiences.
- resize2996 1y ago
  There have been posts about reproducing art and I always thinking maybe I could make a mini-Rothko room in spare room.
  - daseiner1 1y ago
    that would be cool! sincerely. post it here if you do. i feel like the above comment might come across as sarcastic but i genuinely find it super cool when a layman can master a new discipline with force of will and publicly available writings. much like vermeer's much speculated-upon clever use of technology ;)
adastra22 1y ago
I think you are projecting. I don’t recall getting any of that from the movie, which I recall being very respectful of Vermeer’s legacy. The narrators (Penn and Teller) are themselves magicians and it would be immensely hypocritical of them to denigrate an artist by showing there’s an underlying trick.