5 ms·
No mention of this in the Wikipedia's article on the movie. I wonder if they would consider this a valid source.
by neuroelectron 1y ago
No mention of this in the Wikipedia's article on the movie. I wonder if they would consider this a valid source.
- duskwuff 1y agoAbsolutely. It's a published article by a reputable source - the fact that it had to be obtained by FOIA doesn't make it any less so. As an aside, I'm amused that the FOIA officer felt the need to redact the names of the fictitious agents in the image captions on pages 11, 12, and 13.
- neuroelectron 1y agoUnfortunately I was banned many years ago for "battleground behavior" for pointing out strategies (gish gallop and paradoxical source standards requirements) used to prevent relevant information being posted on politically charged articles, in the relevant talk pages of biased users or else I would contribute some edits myself. Some of these strategies have been exposed but the defenses have just evolved.