I imagine Searle feels vindicated since LLMs are good at translating Chinese. On the other hand I am reminded of Nilsson's rebuttal: > For all I know, Searle

I imagine Searle feels vindicated since LLMs are good at translating Chinese. On the other hand I am reminded of Nilsson's rebuttal: > For all I know, Searle may only be behaving as if he were thinking deeply about these matters. But, even though I disagree with him, his simulation is pretty good, so I’m willing to credit him with real thought.