3 ms·

I fail to see the problem. Either something is portable, or something is not. It is basically up to the developer. If not being portable means way less time sp

by bkor 14y ago

I fail to see the problem. Either something is portable, or something is not. It is basically up to the developer. If not being portable means way less time spent on development, then some people might choose that. Good for them.

pjmlp 14y ago
Yeah, but then when developers in other OS besides GNU/Linux take the same attitude, they get bashed to death for not caring about portable software.
- gillianseed 14y ago
  do they? do you have any examples?
  - dredmorbius 14y ago
    Microsoft. Apple. IBM. DEC. Oh, wait, that didn't work out so well, now did it?