4 ms·
Well, yeah. It would have shown that their commissions are nothing but rent-seeking.
by cyberax 2y ago
Well, yeah. It would have shown that their commissions are nothing but rent-seeking.
- ivanmontillam 2y agoExactly my point! This would kick the wasp's nest of "they (Apple) don't need this much money to operate, they can do well with 10% profit!" Which is very hard to admit, that profit margins are arbitrary when you, indeed, dominate the market. Apple doesn't want (nor need) to give anyone a handle to anyone to make them accountable. It is not a charity. (Again, I'm not defending Apple, but I do defend corporate liberties, in general.)
- ysavir 2y agoAre you defending their corporate liberty to withhold information or to lie about the information being withheld?
- to11mtm 2y agoWhen a company builds the moat too high (i.e. restrictions on external sub signups) it becomes monopolistic. Apple is honestly worse than Microsoft in so many ways as far as restrictions (nowadays, anyway) and yet it's taken this long even to get here. (To be clear, I am not a fan of Google's actions in the mobile space either...)
- girvo 2y agoMobile space Ad space Search space And more!
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]