3 ms·
Sort of. The benchmarks showing Flash 2.5 doing really well are benchmarking its thinking mode, which is 4x more expensive than Mercury here
by jbellis 1y ago
Sort of. The benchmarks showing Flash 2.5 doing really well are benchmarking its thinking mode, which is 4x more expensive than Mercury here
- NitpickLawyer 1y agoIs cost really the main differentiator here, tho? "Solving" coding seems like the holy grail atm (and I agree, it can enable a bunch of things once that's done) and "traditional, organic, human fed code" is pretty expensive atm, so does cost really matter now? Put another way, how much would company x be willing to spend on "here's a repo, here are the tests, here is the speed now, make this faster while still passing all the tests". If it "solves" something in cudnn that makes it 10% faster, how much would nvidia pay for this? 1m$? 10m$?
- jph00 1y agoFlash 2.5 without thinking mode is also exceptionally good fwiw.