3 ms·
The argument that I assume you are talking about has some nuance around it. It's mostly about politically connected or nepotistic people who are pulling large s
by paleotrope 1y ago
The argument that I assume you are talking about has some nuance around it. It's mostly about politically connected or nepotistic people who are pulling large salaries for essentially little to no work. I'm sure most regular employees at a nonprofit get treated as poorly as those of us at a normal business.
- cycomanic 1y agoBut's usually not the argument being made, the complains (same in this case) are often about the salaries of the people doing the actual work. Sure I understand the complains about multi-million salaries for the CEOs of some non-for-profit (on the other hand I have the same complains about the ridiculous salaries of CEOs of for-profits), but if that's the nuance, it doesn't come out in the complains.
- paleotrope 1y agoWell without actual examples from any supposed position, this discussion goes nowhere.
- cycomanic 1y agoWhat do you mean? We are discussing an example right here???