There still seems to be people in the loop and this person isn't making any changes himself. > Sweet’s primary role appears to be leading an effort to leverage

There still seems to be people in the loop and this person isn't making any changes himself. > Sweet’s primary role appears to be leading an effort to leverage artificial intelligence to review HUD’s regulations, compare them to the laws on which they are based, and identify areas where rules can be relaxed or removed altogether. [...] [He] has produced an Excel spreadsheet with around a thousand rows containing areas of policy where the AI tool has flagged that HUD may have “overreached” and suggesting replacement language. > Staffers from PIH are, specifically, asked to review the AI’s recommendations and justify their objections to those they don’t agree with. “It all sounds crazy—having AI recommend revisions to regulations,” one HUD source says. “But I appreciated how much they’re using real people to confirm and make changes.” > Once the PIH team completes the review, their recommendations will be submitted to the Office of the General Counsel for approval.