4 ms·

Ugh, Want... $1,899.99... Pause...

• Our_Benefactors 1y ago
  Seriously, that price is insane for what you get. That costs more than what gets you a top tier 32” 4K OLED screen with a high refresh rate.
  • techpineapple 1y ago
    Hopefully it's just a start? I would probably love to replace my displays with a high fidelity e-paper, I think it would make working much more enjoyable.
  • karmakaze 1y ago
    > its slow refresh rate makes it problematic for desktop computing tasks like browsing the web. Hmm, I'm not sure what I'd use something like this for. Might be better as a phone as a follow up to their phone-size Palma e-reader.
  • Pet_Ant 1y ago
    > Seriously, that price is insane for what you get. Sorry, but how are you evaluating that? You'd get this because you want a non-emissive display, so what other non-emissive displays are you comparing it against? Yes, if you want better color acuity, refresh rates, or cost-per-inch, you don't want eInk. I don't think that is news. Otherwise you are a motorcycle rider calling cars too expensive.
    • Our_Benefactors 1y ago
      My position is that you are giving up too much for that one single feature.
• jerrysievert 1y ago
  plus $2753.55 of tariffs if you live in the United States, makes it even more insane.