I'm skeptical of the idea that money and fix any problem, and that there are no inherent differences. Setting that aside, why do you think it is even desirable

I'm skeptical of the idea that money and fix any problem, and that there are no inherent differences. Setting that aside, why do you think it is even desirable to limit funding to public institutions in the first place? Seems like you're starting from this position and moving backwards. If Public schools are superior, why haven't they already out competed private institutions? They have a pretty huge advantage from additional tax revenue.