3 ms·
A bit reductionist perhaps. I assume the reason they are pushung it further is that they didn't submit to the police requesting information. Good on them for no
by lawik 1y ago
A bit reductionist perhaps. I assume the reason they are pushung it further is that they didn't submit to the police requesting information. Good on them for not cooperating but this is the lever a nation can pull in response.
- spwa4 1y agoThat reasoning only makes sense if the scam callcenters DO cooperate with Indian police/court and the state is actively happy with scam center responses (and so with their business). Because you can be 1000% sure they got sued. So you're saying the same thing, just a more polite. You're still saying that the Indian government cooperates with scam call centers.
- southernplaces7 1y ago>That reasoning only makes sense if the scam callcenters DO cooperate with Indian police/court Yes, or the obvious, that their ringleaders pay hefty bribes up the government food chain, as is common in many, many countries with organized crime activity. Protonmail presumably didn't do any such thing, aside from also refusing to cooperate legally. Either way, shame to see India going down this road of censoring X and Y or random snooping for reasons of political expediency.
- Vaslo 1y agoNot reductionist at all. A country so steeped in corruption that even all its natural advantages (lots of English speakers, big population, low wages) can’t compete with China. They (their government specifically) needs to get their act together in the 21st century.