This is odd - it keeps mentioning Open Source but the Llama license isn’t open source at all - see https://www.llama.com/llama3/license/ https://www.llama.com/

This is odd - it keeps mentioning Open Source but the Llama license isn’t open source at all - see https://www.llama.com/llama3/license/ https://www.llama.com/llama3/license/. The “additional commercial terms” section violates the open source definition as does the advertising clause. I would’ve hoped to have seen Meta, in their supposed dedication to open source, actually fix it.