3 ms·
They were late to commercialize it... someone else had to show them how first. As a result they are playing catch up, and they will at best be one of many playe
by breadwinner 1y ago
They were late to commercialize it... someone else had to show them how first. As a result they are playing catch up, and they will at best be one of many players, for the foreseeable future, as opposed to a monopoly.
- voidspark 1y agoA few months head start won’t make much difference in the long run. They have already taken the lead according to many benchmarks.
- Graphon1 1y agoNitpicky maybe, but I think "someone had to show them" is a little off the mark. Google had no incentive to start using AI to deliver answers, because Search was making lots of money. It's not that "someone had to", it's that "someone did". And when they did, Google pivoted.
- ramesh31 1y ago>They were late to commercialize it... someone else had to show them how first. As a result they are playing catch up, and they will at best be one of many players, for the foreseeable future, as opposed to a monopoly. This isn't a hype cycle they need to catch. It's the final technology. Steady and stable will win here.