3 ms·
It does not demonstrate their point. The discussion is about toxicity from metals in soil. We all know that toxicity is not binary. It’s a dumb retort. It’s
by redczar 1y ago
It does not demonstrate their point. The discussion is about toxicity from metals in soil. We all know that toxicity is not binary. It’s a dumb retort. It’s as dumb as people saying “correlation does not imply causation” when the authors of an article have expertise in statistical reasoning.
Obviously the phrase “toxic water” means water polluted by toxins. Go be a pedant to someone else.
- quesera 1y agoApologies -- you were not demonstrating your expertise in upthread comments, so I could only guess at your level of understanding.