3 ms·
The syntax put me off at first, and still bothers me a bit (something to do with too much symbolic sugar and existing familiarity with escape chars) That said.
by spartango 14y ago
The syntax put me off at first, and still bothers me a bit (something to do with too much symbolic sugar and existing familiarity with escape chars)
That said...
I feel like this streaming syntax might be better suited as a meta-programming framework of sorts...build the more intricate objects/modules in a language such as C/C++ or java, and use these stream/latch metaphors to orchestrate those modules.
Yes, you can already do this with *sh (largely the point of Unix pipes), or directly in C/C++/Java (e.g. Storm), but ANI seems to provide a really rich interface for this kind of orchestration. It has many of the right primitives.
- rdtsc 14y ago> feel like this streaming syntax might be better suited as a meta-programming framework of sorts I think that is why the criticism is more apparent. It is exciting to have those features, but then the syntax just pushed you away.