4 ms·
I still don't get why .NET barely ever gets mentioned in these threads. Even new or niche frameworks like Phoenix, loco.rs and others get mentioned, but almost
by hnhn34 1y ago
I still don't get why .NET barely ever gets mentioned in these threads. Even new or niche frameworks like Phoenix, loco.rs and others get mentioned, but almost never .NET. It's as "convention over configuration" as it gets.
- dqv 1y agoPlatform support and open-sourcedness. The Phoenix 1.0 release predates the first open-source and Linux-supported .NET release by a year, for example. .NET is just now starting to shake off its association as a closed-source, Windows-only thing.
- dgellow 1y ago.NET has been open source since a decade
- adamors 1y agoAnd Ruby on Rails was released 20 years ago
- dqv 1y agoYes, like I said before, Phoenix 1.0 predates the first open-source and Linux-supported .NET release by a year. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10135825 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10135825 https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/main/release-notes%2F1.0%2F1.0.0.md https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/main/release-notes%2F1.0... People aren't just going to jump onto something recently open-sourced by a company that popularized the phrase "embrace, extend, extinguish". For the last decade, they've had to earn people's goodwill, while with a project like Rails, there is no "we used to be closed source but now we're not, use our thing!" to overcome. So in the 20 years since Rails has been released, it has only ever needed to demonstrate its usefulness. Now that a decade has past, that negative association is starting to wash away a little.