3 ms·
TFA title seems odd. Article sez Backblaze has responded to the claims of "sham accounting" and (indirectly) to the claims that "customers backsups [are] at ris
by VTimofeenko 1y ago
TFA title seems odd. Article sez Backblaze has responded to the claims of "sham accounting" and (indirectly) to the claims that "customers backsups [are] at risk", yet the title wording implies that the backups are at risk as a consequence of BB responding.
- abrookewood 1y agoNot really - if they continue to lose the money that they are losing, then they could go bankrupt. If they never reach profitability, then the only other option is to keep borrowing/raising cash.
- zeckalpha 1y agoAmbiguous but different semantic commas. In one interpretation, it is a connective between two "claims" in a list. In the other, it is a consequence of the response (as you interpreted). This is worsened by the convention of putting punctuation inside quotation marks.
- dang 1y agoMaybe if we quote them symnmetrically the problem will go away?
- VTimofeenko 1y agoYeah, the extra quotes do help