4 ms·
It probably helps when you can simply take the land you need. One major issue with the California project has been the difficulty in securing land rights. Addit
by vondur 1y ago
It probably helps when you can simply take the land you need. One major issue with the California project has been the difficulty in securing land rights. Additionally, California’s strict environmental laws have made construction even more challenging. In contrast, China can largely ignore these obstacles.
- makotech221 1y ago[flagged]
- gotoeleven 1y agoAren't most companies at least partially government owned in China? What is the chinese definition of personal property?
- suraci 1y ago[flagged]
- zahlman 1y agoEven if untrue (there is plenty of reason to believe it's true), making claims about the government of a country is not "racist". To "lie" also requires intent (there is every reason to believe GP is writing in good faith). Your source is a few pictures taken 11 years ago and doesn't even really demonstrate "respect for personal property" anyway.
- suraci 1y ago[flagged]
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> helps when you can simply take the land you need When America built, this is exactly what we did. CAHSR should have been exempted from CEQA. Its commission should have been delegated eminent-domain powers vetoable only by the Governor or a majority of the legislature. But the goal wasn't to build a train. It was to dole out the dough. And the dough be doleth. Just to litigators, union bosses and Central Valley landowners.
- renewiltord 1y ago[flagged]
- deadfoxygrandpa 1y agodo you have any data to back any of this up?