4 ms·
It's a lot worse. A high quality project can have great documentation and guides that make it easy to use for a human, but an LLM won't until there's a lot of c
by Bolwin 1y ago
It's a lot worse. A high quality project can have great documentation and guides that make it easy to use for a human, but an LLM won't until there's a lot of code and documents out there using it.
And if it's not already popular, that won't happen.
- tptacek 1y agoNo, this doesn't ring true: long before there were LLMs, people were selecting languages and stacks because of the quality and depth of their community. But also: there is a lot of Rust code out there! And a cubic fuckload of high-quality written material about the language, its idioms, and its libraries, many of which are pretty famous. I don't think this issue is as simple as it's being out to be.
- tayo42 1y agoIsn't this article an example of that. There might be a lot of rust code but if the apis are changing frequently it's all outdated and leads to unusable outputs.
- littlestymaar 1y agoIt's not Rust in particular, but Bevy the game engine which is much newer than Rust and still has many breaking changes between version. It's a bit like Rust in 2014, you would never have had enough material for LLMs to train on.